Key Differences
In short — GeForce MX330 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce MX330 is 981 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 42 vs 41 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 10 vs 35 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
25.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
38.26 GTexel/s
98.0774160471674%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
76.47058823529412%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |