Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 D outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 D is 2232 days newer than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D - 30 vs 425 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
- Performs up to 206% better in Rust than GeForce MX130 - 257 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 24 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Desktop • Dec 28th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
9.512 GPixel/s
2.1447576099210823%
Texel Fillrate
28.54 GTexel/s
2.4838990426457785%
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Desktop • Dec 28th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1149 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 28th, 2023 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 40 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6X |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s |
| 1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2280 MHz |
| 1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2520 MHz |
| 1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz |
