Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1501 days older than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 30 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than GeForce MX130 - 61 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 3 vs 2 GB
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
9.512 GPixel/s
29.725%
Texel Fillrate
28.54 GTexel/s
22.296875%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
