Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 14 days newer than GeForce GTX 750.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 55 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GTX 750 - 25 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 - 3 vs 1 GB
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
21
84%
Value, £/FPS
£17.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£370.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £370.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
34.72 GTexel/s
33%
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$119 | MSRP | $279 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1020 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1085 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |