Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 680M outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 680M is 561 days older than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M - 95 vs 100 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
75.40056550424129%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
56.53710247349822%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
