Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 680 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 680 is 2658 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 1 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 75 vs 65 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 - 65 vs 195 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 - 4 vs 2 GB
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
65
86%
Value, £/FPS
£1.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£122.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £122.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
33.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
135.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$499 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1006 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1058 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |