Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 660M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3590 days newer than GeForce GTX 660M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 29% better in Dead Space than GeForce GTX 660M - 53 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M - 4 vs 1 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
53
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£219.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £219.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
835 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |