Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 565 days newer than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 150 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 660 Ti - 32 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti - 3 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Desktop • Aug 16th, 2012
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Desktop • Aug 16th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
27.44 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
109.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
95%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 16th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $299 | MSRP | $279 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
915 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
980 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
