Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 620 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 34% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 199 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£383.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |