Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 270 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 120 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 81 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £199.99 vs £383.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £2.47 vs £5.65 per FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
81
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£199.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
62%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $799 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |