Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 10% better in FIFA 23 than Radeon R7 240 - 149 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 68% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - £45.95 vs £144.0
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74090 minutes ago
Buy for £45.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
10.51051051051051%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
15.015015015015015%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |