Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 590 is 517 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 590 - 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 590
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 69 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon RX 590
Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
32%
Radeon RX 590
Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1469 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1545 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
