Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 1763 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 30 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 59 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 390
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
