Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 840 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 49 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 620 - 5 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 2 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
