Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2604 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 49 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than GeForce GT 620 - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 4 vs 1 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £124.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |