Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3002 days newer than GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 29 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than GeForce GT 520 - 44 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
44
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£129.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £129.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$59 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |