Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 2244 days newer than GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 29 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 520 - 36 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 2 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
8.307692307692308%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
16.611125352473728%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$59 | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
