Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 3334 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 58 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 150% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than GeForce GT 220 - 100 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 6 vs 1 GB
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
FPS
100
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
5.602240896358543%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
9.166136218968811%
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |