Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 560 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 560 is 2639 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 560 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 560
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 220 - 42 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon RX 560
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
23.52941176470588%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
17.647058823529413%
Radeon RX 560
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Polaris |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1175 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1275 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
