Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 2722 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 58 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 2300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 220 - 24 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 16 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |
