Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5500 is 3667 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Performs up to 66% better in Deathloop than GeForce GT 220 - 68 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
68
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£323.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £323.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
8.086253369272237%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
8.823529411764707%
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1744 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1855 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |