Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce 840M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 22 days newer than GeForce 840M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 78% better in Dead Space than GeForce 840M - 73 vs 41 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 840M - 19 vs 33 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 12th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Mar 12th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
8.992 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
17.98 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
GeForce 800M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
DDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
16.02 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1029 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
1124 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |