Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 660 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 660 is 1060 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 83% cheaper than GeForce GTX 660 - £34.99 vs £199.98
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 31 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than GeForce 210 - 39 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 2 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 521 minutes ago
Buy for £199.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
10.077519379844961%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
5.038759689922481%
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2012 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 600 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 980 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1032 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |