Key Differences
In short — GeForce 210 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce 210 is 1457 days older than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce 210 - £35.46 vs £39.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing New World than GeForce 210 - £0.59 vs £0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 30 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 2 vs 0.5 GB
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
60
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£35.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £35.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |