Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 3690 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 88% cheaper than Radeon Pro W5700 - £34.99 vs £290.39
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 31 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 230% better in Starfield than GeForce 210 - 33 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74855 minutes ago
Buy for £290.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1.7290108063175398%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1.536756557074252%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |