Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms UHD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2067 days older than UHD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 70% better in Starfield than UHD Graphics 610 - 17 vs 10 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
2.1 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
12.6 GTexel/s
12%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
