Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 504 days newer than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 15 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU - 352 vs 331 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
352
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£219.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £219.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
26.4 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
47%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |