Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 2090 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 123% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 118 vs 53 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£383.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
27%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
HD Graphics | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 6 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |