Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 505 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 856 days older than HD Graphics 505.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505
- Consumes up to 99% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 6 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than HD Graphics 505 - 354 vs 321 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.95 GPixel/s
2%
Texel Fillrate
11.7 GTexel/s
6%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 505 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |