Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms HD Graphics 500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 546 days older than HD Graphics 500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 500
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 6 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than HD Graphics 500 - 91 vs 82 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
HD Graphics 500
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 500 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
