Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 1351 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1650 - 36 vs 12 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 6 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
12
33%
Value, £/FPS
£18.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 534 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
66%
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1755 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |