Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 414 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Performs up to 79% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 120 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 1% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - £3.38 vs £3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - 50 vs 200 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
FPS
120
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.41/FPS
99%
Price, £
£409
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for £409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7261 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
67
56%
Value, £/FPS
£3.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£226.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £226.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7261 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
44%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$399 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 12-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1410 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |