In Battlefield 6, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is much slower than the Radeon RX Vega 56. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Dec 17, 2021 vs Aug 14, 2017
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 30 vs 210 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Radeon RX Vega 56
- Up to 118% faster in Battlefield 6 – 48 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 118% faster in Battlefield 6
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Dec 17th, 2021
Average FPS
22 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
16 FPS
44%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Average FPS
48 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
36 FPS
100%
Price, $
$370
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Dec 17th, 2021
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
27%
Pixel Fillrate
39.84 GPixel/s
42%
Texture Fillrate
79.68 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
5.1 TFLOPS
48%
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.54 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Dec 17th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX Vega 56 Aug 14th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 17th, 2021 | Released | Aug 14th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 20 Mobile | Generation | Vega (RX Vega) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 210 W |
