The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 20 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
45%
Min 1% FPS
20
34%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£751.6
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.22/FPS
100%
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
12%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
