The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon 780M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
The Radeon 780M is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 15 vs 20 Watts
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 780M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
80%
Min 1% FPS
20
71%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
100%
Min 1% FPS
28
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 780M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 780M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 780M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
14%
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce MX | Generation | Navi III IGP |
Laptop | Segment | Integrated |
20 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | System-Shared |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | System-Shared |
64-bit | Memory Bus | System-Shared |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 86.4 GPixel/s |
29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 129.6 GTexel/s |
1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.294 TFLOPS |