The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 20 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
28%
Min 1% FPS
20
19%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
10%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
32.98 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 515.3 GTexel/s |
| 1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 32.98 TFLOPS |
