The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
60%
Min 1% FPS
20
49%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
78
100%
Min 1% FPS
41
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
20%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
25%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.884 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
20 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 76.32 GPixel/s |
29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 152.6 GTexel/s |
1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.884 TFLOPS |