The GeForce MX350 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 20 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX350 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
37%
Min 1% FPS
20
27%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, £
£299.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.34/FPS
100%
GeForce MX350 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
6%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Alchemist |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
