Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1524 days newer than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 30 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 1100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce MX130 - 12 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 4 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£17.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 455 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce MX130 | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |