The GeForce GTX 970M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970M
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Average FPS
55
68%
Min 1% FPS
25
58%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£399.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
120.3 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
49.82 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
83.04 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
2.657 TFLOPS
53%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 970M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 7th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 120.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.82 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 83.04 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 2.657 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
