The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
49%
Min 1% FPS
23
40%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£751.6
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.22/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
0%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
