The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
The GeForce GTX 965M is better in every way
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
0%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
