The GeForce GTX 950 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 950
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 90 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 950
Aug 20th, 2015
Average FPS
52
31%
Min 1% FPS
23
22%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, £
£1442.22
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.48/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£1,442.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,309.07
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,300.00
In Stock
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 950
Aug 20th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
105.8 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.825 TFLOPS
8%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 20th, 2015 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$159.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
90 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
105.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
38.02 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
57.02 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
1.825 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |