Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GTX 780 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1993 days newer than GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 53 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - £3.08 vs £15.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 75 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 4 vs 3 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £799.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6828 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6828 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
55.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
222.7 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
96%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
42%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 7th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$699 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
875 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
928 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |