Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms GeForce GTX 765M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 3717 days newer than GeForce GTX 765M.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 114% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 765M - 30 vs 14 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 70 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 8 vs 2 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
30
100%
Value, £/FPS
£14.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£427.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £427.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
13.81 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
55.23 GTexel/s
29%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 765M | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
797 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
863 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |