Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2079 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 55% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - £89.99 vs £199.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - £2.25 vs £3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 60 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 62% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 65 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 6 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
40
62%
Value, £/FPS
£2.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
65
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.08/FPS
73%
Price, £
£199.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
28%
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $229 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
1020 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
1085 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |