Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1253 days newer than GeForce GTX 750 GM206.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 750 GM206
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 60 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 53 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
39.65 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
39.65 GTexel/s
43%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1087 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1239 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |