Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce GTX 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 2724 days newer than GeForce GTX 680M.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 100 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 111% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than GeForce GTX 680M - 57 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M - 8 vs 4 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
57
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£435.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £435.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 453 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
31%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 680M | vs | Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
None | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |