The GeForce GTX 670MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 670MX
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 670MX
Oct 1st, 2012
Average FPS
43
64%
Min 1% FPS
17
52%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 670MX
Oct 1st, 2012
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
67.2 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
12.02 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
48.08 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
1.154 TFLOPS
23%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 670MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
67.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
12.02 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
48.08 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
1.154 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |