Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 3983 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 660.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 660
- Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7500 - £199.98 vs £427.73
- Up to 39% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Radeon PRO W7500 - £1.80 vs £2.93 per FPS
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 32% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 660 - 146 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 70 vs 140 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 8 vs 2 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
FPS
111
76%
Value, £/FPS
£1.8/FPS
100%
Price, £
£199.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £199.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.93/FPS
61%
Price, £
£427.73
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for £427.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
43%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 660 | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$229 | MSRP | $429 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |